Can Galleria mellonella be compared to mammalian models for in vivo assays?
a Systematic Review
Abstract
Purpose: To conduct a systematic review on the use of Galleria mellonella as a non-mammalian model for in vivo studies and assess its potential as an analogue to mammalian models. Methods: This review followed PRISMA guidelines and its guiding question was: “Can G. mellonella be used as an analogue to mammalian models in biological assays?”, defined by PICOs strategy. Searches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were in vivo studies that performed the same assays in both G. mellonella and mammalian models, published as research articles in English, Portuguese, or Spanish. Other insect models and reviews were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified SYRCLE tool. Results: Seven studies were included and their assays investigated virulence, antimicrobial efficacy, and toxicity in both G. mellonella and mammalian models. One study showed low risk of bias, five moderate risk, and one high risk. Comparable trends were observed for virulence and drug efficacy, although methodological heterogeneity limited direct comparisons. Conclusion: G. mellonella is a valuable preclinical model but cannot fully replace mammalian studies. It is best applied as a preliminary screening tool, and further comparative research is required to validate its translational relevance.
Keywords: biological assays, greater wax moth, mammalian model.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vitória Batista Clemente, Matheus Fernandes Lasneau Moraes, Taleessa Vieira Gomes, Amanda Marota de Oliveira, Mariana Simões de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Morais Apolônio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication through this journal.
This license lets others distribute, remix, adapt and create upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. It is the most flexible license of all available. It is recommended for maximizing the dissemination and use of the licensed materials.
Authors are permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. by posting it to an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
See the full legal text of the license at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/









